What I’m Thinking: The ‘Apapane’s Christmas Pageant


I don’t know how it came into the ‘apapane’s head to organize a Christmas pageant. I don’t even know how he’d heard about Christmas, let alone a Christmas pageant. Nevertheless, he flew all over the island, searching for creatures to take part in the pageant.
He asked the I’iwi, who was feeling grumpy that day and didn’t say yes, or no, or anything at all.

He asked the ‘io, which was very brave of him. The ‘io said she might come and looked… hungry.

He flew down to the shoreline to ask the honu. She said no, she wasn’t going to swim up to the mountain forest, which seemed fair. A house sparrow said he might fly up after he’d finished his bath.

A saffron finch thought it sounded odd but said he might hang around for it. The ‘apapane asked a yellow-billed cardinal and a myna. They both looked doubtful, and then the myna started an argument with some other mynas that wasn’t over when he left to talk to more shorebirds.

The auku’u looked puzzled, but said he’d come. “I’m coming, too,” announced a kolea. “I’ve flown thousands of miles for this. I wouldn’t miss it.”

“If the kolea is coming, I’m coming, too,” piped up an ‘akekeke, and a hunakai said the same.
The koa’e kea announced that she would play Mary, because didn’t Mary have a long tail? The ‘apapane wasn’t sure, so he didn’t argue. An ala’e ke’oke’o asked if there was a good fish pond up in the forest, and when he was told there wasn’t, looked skeptical.

The ae’o said she might turn up. If she felt like it. If she didn’t have anything else to do. The cattle egret said, of course he’d be there. One of his ancestors had been present at the original birth, hadn’t she?

The ‘apapane left the shorebirds to spread the word further and returned to the forest. The oma’o stopped singing barely long enough to say, “Yes.” The ‘alawi just looked nervous and kept hunting insects without saying anything.

He searched long and hard for an ‘akiapola’au, who asked, “What’s that all about?” After listening to the ‘apapane’s explanation, he gave a whistle and flew off into the forest. The nene just stared at him.

When it was pageant time, it was chaos. Creatures stepped into the clearing the ‘apapane had selected, then faded back into the trees again. Frightened chirps flew back and forth, and so did frightened birds. Mejiro and ‘elepaio peeped out from the trees. The mynas announced that they would be the angel chorus, then exploded into another argument.

“What do you need to settle down and play your parts?” shouted the ‘apapane from a tree.

“Is the ‘io here?” asked an ‘amakihi. “Yes,” said the ‘io from the sky overhead. “Are you going to eat us?” asked the ‘amakihi. For a moment there was silence. Then the ‘io said, “No. Not today. Today there’s a pageant to do.”

The ‘apapane spent the next hour answering the questions. The koa’e kea had just flown in from a lava fountain, and since she wanted to play Mary, she did. A kioea had flown up from the shore and wanted to play Joseph. “You’re a rare bird,” said the ‘apapane, so he did. The little ‘elepaio played shepherds while the nene played sheep. The I’iwi didn’t want to cheer up, so he played the grumpy innkeeper. The sleeping pig was cast as a sleeping cow and did it very well.

High overhead the ‘io provided the voice of Gabriel, while ‘apapane, ‘amakihi, mejiro, and mynas sang as the angel chorus. Seabirds and shorebirds took places as creatures of the stable.

When the time came, birds from other shores – a northern cardinal, a red junglefowl, and a pair of zebra doves – played the magi.

The ‘akiapola’au lay just one egg and very rarely, so a young one played Jesus.

When it was over, the creatures vanished back into the trees, leaving the ‘apapane alone in the silence. He’d answered every question, met every need, somehow.

The trees rustled in the breeze, applauding the ‘apapene’s Christmas pageant.

Mele Kalikimaka!

What I’m Thinking: Dream

Joseph had a dream, and it changed what he did, and what he did changed things for Mary and Jesus, and what they all did changed the world. What is your dream?

Here’s a transcript:

The service for the Fourth Sunday of advent the Church of the Holy Cross will feature the Christmas pageant performed by our young people. I’m not thinking about this week’s Scripture with the idea that it will become a sermon, but I am still thinking about the first chapter of Matthew (Matthew 1:18-25).

Luke described the circumstances of Jesus birth; Matthew didn’t. Matthew, however, talked about one of the real difficult moments in that series of events: because when Joseph discovered that Mary was pregnant, he determined to set her aside: quietly, so that she wouldn’t be shamed any more than she already was.

Then he had a dream, and in that dream an angel assured him that she was with child by the Holy Spirit, that this child would be the Messiah, and that he would be the one who would be called Immanuel, God with us.

You’ve got to have a dream.

That’s an old song from a musical, but it’s also true. Dreams change things when we set out to put those dreams into reality.

Joseph might have shrugged it off — I’m not sure how you shrug off the words of an angel whether in waking life or in dream life — but he could have. Mary could have had her child, the Messiah, all alone, cut off from family and friends. But Joseph had a dream, and Joseph’s dream meant that he had a role to play, and that was a supportive partner to those who were taking the lead roles: to Mary the mother who would carry and then comfort the newborn child, to Jesus himself, Jesus who would eventually carry everything including the cross, that Jesus had done so because Joseph had a dream and set out to live that dream.

What is your dream? Is it a dream of love and care and support? Is it a dream that overcomes your prejudices? Is it a dream that leads towards life becoming better, not just for you, not just for your family, but for all those around you and those perhaps on the far side of the world?

Dreams change life. Have a dream and live it.

That’s what I’m thinking. I’m curious to hear what you’re thinking. Leave me your thoughts in the comment section below. I’d love to hear from you.

What I’m Thinking: Good News

When John asked Jesus if he were the they’d been waiting for, Jesus took the opportunity to define what a Messiah was, and to invite everyone into thee Realm of God.

Here’s a transcript:

For this third Sunday of Advent, I’m thinking about the eleventh chapter of Matthew’s Gospel (Matthew 11:2-11). If this seems a little far along in the book to be describing things that happened before Jesus’ birth, well, it is.

John the Baptist, who had baptized Jesus, had been arrested and was being held in prison by King Herod. He sent messengers to Jesus to ask him if he was the one who had been promised, or should they wait for another? Jesus said to the messengers, go and tell John what you see and hear: the people are being healed, the dead are being raised, the poor hear good news.

The messengers left, and hopefully that message brought John some comfort and reassurance.

Jesus then turned to the crowd and asked them why they had gone out to see John the Baptist in the first place? Did they go to hear a reed that was being blown by the wind? Did they go to see somebody in great clothing?

No. They went to hear a prophet. And yet, said Jesus, the least in the realm of God is greater than John the Baptist.

Well, that’s a lot, isn’t it?

In this message, Jesus defined for us what he meant an Anointed One, a Messiah, to be: a healer, a teacher, someone who restored people to life, someone who restored people to the full care of their communities. But Jesus also defined what it is to be a prophet. A prophet is one who tells the truth despite discomfort, despite oppression.

But Jesus also said it is God’s grace, the grace that brings us into the realm of God, that surpasses everything. God’s grace made John a prophet. God’s grace makes each and every one of us a citizen of God’s realm.

As we approach this season of Christmas, as we prepare to rejoice once more in the gift of Jesus Christ, let us rejoice as well that we have been included in that same realm of God as John the Baptist, that we share it with that great prophet and with so many other saints over time.

That’s what I’m thinking. I’m curious to hear what you’re thinking. Leave me your thoughts in the comment section below. I’d love to hear from you.

What I’m Thinking: Peaceable Kingdom

Isaiah’s vision of an utterly peaceful world began with wisdom, compassion, righteousness, and peace. May we move toward it this Advent season.

Here’s a transcript:

I’m thinking about the eleventh chapter of the prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 11:1-10). This coming Sunday is the second Sunday of Advent. The theme is peace, so it is entirely appropriate that the Isaiah reading is one of his accounts of the Peaceable Kingdom.

The wolf and the lamb lying down together. The lion eating straw like the ox. “And a little child shall lead them.”

Not surprisingly, Isaiah started with a description of what leadership would look like: that a shoot would emerge from the stump of Jesse, and that this new monarch would rule in a new and different way, with wisdom, with righteousness, with the fear of the Lord – that kind of reverent respect that, well, is frankly very uncommon amongst leaders of nations, now isn’t it?

The foundation of peace for the natural world, Isaiah said, was peace within the human world.

I can’t say that that is obviously true. If human beings ceased to make war upon one another, if human beings ceased to commit crimes against one another, if human beings abandoned violence forever, I’m afraid there would still be hunting in the forests and in the seas – at least until God changes the world. Nevertheless, Isaiah was absolutely right to seek out that first part of the vision rooted in peace amongst human beings. Because even if we can’t directly affect the peace of the rest of Creation, we can make peace amongst ourselves. We can choose wisdom over folly. We can choose compassion over violence. We can choose peace.

All too frequently, we choose folly. We choose violence. we choose war. All too rarely, we choose wisdom. We choose compassion. We choose peace.

In this Advent season, may we take a step, even a fraction of a step, towards Isaiah’s vision. Let us choose wisdom, righteousness, compassion, and peace.

That’s what I’m thinking. I’m curious to hear what you’re thinking. Leave me your thoughts in the comment section below; I’d love to hear from you.

What I’m Thinking: Worthy Hope

Hope is an exercise in imagination: to believe the world can be better than it is. Let us hope for and work for what is worthy: a world of peace.

Here’s a transcript:

I’m thinking about the second chapter of the prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 2:1-5). That’s his vision of the mountain of Jerusalem, Mount Zion, becoming the focus for the peoples of the world, streaming into its gates to learn the ways of God. In those days, Isaiah imagined, then swords would be beaten into plowshares and spears into pruning books because it would be the day of peace.

There are times in life, in history, in communities, in societies when the word “hope” gets tossed about: How do I find hope? How do I maintain hope? In the face of what may be really severe conditions, somebody afflicted by a major storm or an earthquake: where do they find hope? Someone in the midst of war: where do they find hope? Someone in the midst of injustice: where do they find hope?

Ind I wish that I had a way to tell you how to feel hopeful. The problem is that I can’t tell you how to feel anything. The hope that I can say something about is a hope that we choose. It is an exercise in imagination, of looking at what is and deciding that it does not need to be that way. It can be different, it should be different, and with work and the grace of God it will be different.

I can still feel pretty pessimistic about it all, but I choose to believe that the evils that are will fail, and the good which is not yet will come to be.

So there’s that decision to hope. There’s also the choice of what to hope for. I stand with Isaiah: a vision of peace, a vision of people ordering themselves into a supportive society. There are plenty of people in the world who hope for very different things. They might hope for their personal enrichment. They might hope to dominate others. They might hope that their nation invades and overthrows others. To my mind these are not worthy hopes.

These are not the hopes of Isaiah. They’re not the hopes of Jesus. I’d say they are not the hopes — the proper hopes — of the followers of Jesus.

Choose to hope. Choose to hope for blessed communities. Choose to hope for peace.

That’s what I’m thinking. I’m curious to hear what you’re thinking. Leave me your thoughts in the comment section below. I’d love to hear from you.

What I’m Thinking: True Majesty

When we celebrate the rule of Christ, we celebrate a majesty revealed not in power, but in grace.

Here’s a transcript:

This coming Sunday concludes the traditional church worship year. That year begins with Advent, with the preparation for the birth of Jesus, which makes a kind of sense. But the year doesn’t have an obvious close, so the last Sunday before Advent is known as the Reign of Christ. It celebrates not just the divinity, what the authority, the rulership if you like, of Jesus.

And so I am thinking about the twenty-third chapter of Luke: the crucifixion of Christ.

Jesus did two things in this passage from Luke, and there was one thing he didn’t do. He prayed, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.” He prayed that from of the cross, from that instrument of deadly torture.

He told a fearful, tortured thief that he, too, would see paradise. Those were the two things he did.

What he didn’t do was to follow the taunts of those who said, “If you are the king, come down. If you are the king, exercise your power. If you are the king, show us in the only way that we recognize.”

In Christ’s crucifixion we learn what true majesty is. It is not gold fixtures or crowns. It is not triumphant leadership of armies or the direction of people against other people. It is forgiveness, and assurance, and the restraint of power.

That is what we celebrate when we call Jesus Christ a monarch, a ruler, a king. That is what we rejoice in when we rejoice in the reign of Christ.

We Christians have emulated the more traditional notions of monarchy time after time after time over the centuries, and it is not to our credit. But Jesus on the cross showed us once and for all what true majesty is, what true power is, what it means to reign.

That’s what I’m thinking. I’m curious to hear what you’re thinking. Leave me your thoughts in the comment section below. I’d love to hear from you.

What I’m Thinking: Who Doesn’t Work?

Paul told the Thessalonians that those who don’t work shouldn’t eat. But who didn’t work in the first century? Leaders.

Here’s a transcript:

I’m thinking about the third chapter of Paul Second Letter to the Thessalonians (2 Thessalonians 3:6-13). It’s an odd section. Paul raised an issue that he raised very rarely in his other surviving letters: that is the question of people who didn’t want to work.

Now, how many people actually do want to work? I don’t particularly want to work. I have to for a couple of reasons. One, of course, is that I like to fulfill other people’s expectations. Another is that I enjoy having a place to live and things to eat, and those come to me through work. And it must be said that if I didn’t work in this vocation to which God has called me, I’d be hearing about it from God.

And I do like to sleep through the night.

Most people in the first century had to work. They had no other option. They were poor. If they went very long without working, then there wasn’t anything that was going to come in. A fair number of the people in the Thessalonian church were probably slaves. They didn’t have any choice about whether to work or not.

So one of the questions that I bring to this particular passage is: who was Paul talking about? Who was in that church that had the ability to not work?

The answer I come up with is: leadership. Leaders within the church.

There were people in the first century who didn’t work (at least, compared to the vast majority of the poor people of the time). Those would have been the wealthy landowners, the nobility, the members of the imperial family. That’s a very small number of people indeed. So why would there have been people in this struggling Christian congregation in Thessalonica who were able to not work? Were they entirely relying upon the charity of the other members of the church? Quite possibly, but why would they think they could do that at all?

And I think they were emulating Roman custom, or at least Roman style. If you were a leader, you didn’t work. If you were in charge, you didn’t work. If you had the right of command, you didn’t work.

Paul made clear in a couple of his letters that one of his practices was to avoid burdening the churches that he was working with as they were born and initially developed. He maintained a vocation, a profession, and funded his work that way. He also says in this section that he had a right to be supported by the people in the church. So I think the ones who are asserting a right to be cared for by the people of the church are not the elderly who worked as much as they can. It’s not the sick who can no longer make the efforts without collapsing. And it’s certainly not the poorest of the poor who’ve worked all their lives.

It’s the leaders. It’s the ones in charge. They — we — are the ones most likely to take advantage of others’ resources and rely on them, and not take care of ourselves.

So as you think what about people who work, as you think about the people who lead, remember that leadership and work are supposed to be united. Leadership and work are supposed to go hand in hand. Leadership and leisure, at least in Paul’s eyes, not so much.

That’s what I’m thinking. I’m curious to hear what you’re thinking. Leave me your thoughts in the comment section below. I’d love to hear from you.

What I’m Thinking: When Will It End?

The Christians suffering persecution in Thessalonica wanted to know when it would end. Paul couldn’t tell them, just urge them to hold to their faith and compassion.

Here’s a transcript:

I’m thinking about the second chapter of Paul’s Second Letter to the Thessalonians (2 Thessalonians 2:1-5, 13-17).

In this chapter Paul commented on the return of Christ, the Second Coming, if you will (though he didn’t call it that). The reason, I suspect, is that the Christians in Thessalonica had been having a very bad time. Paul commented on it in his First Letter to the Thessalonians, that they had been enduring some pretty harsh persecution. He compared it to the persecution that he himself had suffered in Jerusalem.

By the time he wrote the Second Letter it appears that that had not ended. They were still going through some very harsh times.

In times like that, the basic question on anyone’s mind would be: “When will it end? And indeed, when will it end in some kind of reversal, in some kind of justice, in some kind of event so that those who persecuted us suffer and we ourselves triumph?

And Paul’s comments here: to me, well, they’re a little obscure, because he talks about some mysterious figure that will sit in the temple (or possibly already was sitting in the temple) and clearly Paul had discussed this with the folks in Thessalonica and so he left the details out. The point is —— and it was a point that he made in First Thessalonians — that we still have to endure, and we still have to live out the lives to which we were called by Jesus as we do so. We still need to do good works for one another. We still need to pray for one another. We still need to bring our compassion to one another even when it is hard.

These are also harsh times. We’ve just come through a global pandemic: harsh times. There are wars in the world in which people suffer terribly: harsh times. And we are looking at the withdrawal of supports from the poorest of the poor here in the United States and elsewhere around the world: harsh times.

We are asked to hold to our faith, to trust in the grace and compassion of God. And in the midst of it all, to exercise our capacity for love and care and tenderly bring to those who suffer the most the resources, the aid, and the compassion that we can, the compassion which has been given to us by Jesus Christ.

That’s what I’m thinking. I’m curious to hear what you’re thinking. Leave me your thoughts in the comment section below. I’d love to hear from you.

What I’m Thinking: Up a Tree

Jesus invited Zacchaeus down from the tree and into society. What do we do when others seek to come down from where they have climbed into trees?

Here’s a transcript:

I’m thinking about the nineteenth chapter of Luke’s Gospel (Luke 19:1-10): Jesus’ visit to Jericho and his encounter with a tax collector named Zacchaeus.

I remember this story fondly from my childhood. I wasn’t a tall boy, and so I rather sympathized with Zacchaeus, who wasn’t tall either. He wanted to see Jesus, so he went and he climbed a tree. He saw Jesus. Jesus saw him, called him by name and he invited himself to Zacchaeus’ house for dinner.

I don’t remember whether I thought that that was odd at the time (it would have been odd to have somebody invite themselves to dinner in my hometown). I do know from reading this text and reading commentaries since then that it was very odd. You see, Zacchaeus was a tax collector not for local authorities, but for the Romans. That made him a collaborator with a hated foreign power. It meant that most people would have considered him to be something of a thief, and something of a traitor.

This may not have bothered him— the wealthy tend to hang out with the wealthy, after all —and he could afford the dissatisfaction, even the scorn, of most other people in the community. But apparently he treasured the respect of Jesus.

Jesus called him down from the tree.

When somebody’s up a tree in our lives, and when somebody wants to make a change, it’s so easy to look at them and say, “Well, get yourself down. Get yourself out of trouble. Get yourself right.”

And, indeed, we need to take responsibility for our own actions. We need to make the changes ourselves.

But when we are at the bottom of the tree, and watching somebody take those first hesitant moves toward the ground, can’t we help? Can’t we be among those who say, “That branch there, that will take you. Put your foot there. And move your hand to this other lower branch. I know you can’t see it, but it’s there. Give it a try. It will hold.”

And when they get down from the tree, can’t we be those who welcome with a warm embrace? And say, “I am so glad to be coming to your house to have you welcome me and I welcome you to the solid ground.”

The ground of goodness and mercy and community.

That’s why Jesus called Zacchaeus down, so that somebody who had separated himself from those around him could be reunited, and a part of that city for good, and yes, for God.

That’s what I’m thinking. I’m curious to hear what you’re thinking. Leave me your thoughts in the comment section below. I’d love to hear from you.

What I’m Thinking: What Makes Them Saints

I’m thinking about the Beatitudes this week, and what they tell us about who the saints in our lives have been.

Here’s a transcript:

I’m thinking about the sixth chapter of Luke’s Gospel (Luke 6:20-31), the opening to what Luke called the Sermon on the Plain. That is not the regular Gospel reading found in the Revised Common Lectionary for this coming Sunday. You see, at Church of the Holy Cross we observe All Saints Day on the last Sunday in October. This reading is from the All Saints portion of the lectionary.

It seemed suitable because we will be remembering those who have blessed us with their lives. And so it seemed right to go to the Beatitudes: blessed are the poor, blessed are the meek, blessed are those who weep, blessed are those who are hated for Jesus’ sake.

More than that, though, there was Jesus’ advice (once he had gone through the blessings and, in Luke, gone through the woes). He said, “I say to you that listen: love your enemies. Do good to those who hate you. Bless those who curse you. Pray for those who abuse you.”

Isn’t that the difference between the ones who made our lives better and the ones who made our lives worse?

There are plenty of people in the world — and plenty of people who will tell you that this is a virtue — who require evil for evil. They demand to be paid back for what has happened to them. Or they are out in front of it. “Do unto them before they do unto you,” is one way I’ve heard it expressed.

That’s not Jesus. For Jesus, it’s bless those who hate you, do good to those who seek to harm you.

And this is the advice, the direction, the demand that Jesus made of us who claim to follow Christ. Do good. Don’t hate. Don’t harm.

Isn’t that why we honor those we call saints? Isn’t that what we saw in them that makes us miss them? That made us love them? That makes us love them still? They did good for us and for others around them. They followed the directions of Jesus. They were and they are the Saints of God.

So we will remember them and honor them coming Sunday and, yes, with every  moment of memory in our lives.

That’s what I’m thinking. I’m curious to hear what you’re thinking. Leave me your thoughts in the comment section below. I’d love to hear from you.